Hi,

(2013/04/01 15:55), Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> Currently, initializing kprobe_blacklist is done during boot process.
> It takes 230 ms on our android platform and this is significant amount
> for our use case. We can disable CONFIG_KPROBES for production kernel,
> but it is hassle. This kprobe functionality is not commonly used,
> so we don't need to pay this cost at all times. With this rationale,
> change code to initialize kprobe_blacklist when it is used firstly.

I saw similar patch from Oskar and Toby, and I decided to wait
until his blacklist separating work. I'd like to ask Oskar
how the patch is going first.

Thank you,

> 
> Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ana...@in.ibm.com>
> Cc: Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamur...@intel.com>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <da...@davemloft.net>
> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo....@lge.com>
> ---
> I fotgot to add lkml.
> Sorry for noise.
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
> index e35be53..5e90092 100644
> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ static struct kprobe_blackpoint kprobe_blacklist[] = {
>       {"mcount",},    /* mcount can be called from everywhere */
>       {NULL}    /* Terminator */
>  };
> +static bool kprobe_blacklist_initialized;
>  
>  #ifdef __ARCH_WANT_KPROBES_INSN_SLOT
>  /*
> @@ -1324,6 +1325,49 @@ out:
>       return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static void __kprobes init_kprobe_blacklist(void)
> +{
> +     unsigned long offset = 0, size = 0;
> +     char *modname, namebuf[128];
> +     const char *symbol_name;
> +     void *addr;
> +     struct kprobe_blackpoint *kb;
> +
> +     mutex_lock(&kprobe_mutex);
> +     if (kprobe_blacklist_initialized)
> +             goto out;
> +
> +     /*
> +      * Lookup and populate the kprobe_blacklist.
> +      *
> +      * Unlike the kretprobe blacklist, we'll need to determine
> +      * the range of addresses that belong to the said functions,
> +      * since a kprobe need not necessarily be at the beginning
> +      * of a function.
> +      */
> +     for (kb = kprobe_blacklist; kb->name != NULL; kb++) {
> +             kprobe_lookup_name(kb->name, addr);
> +             if (!addr)
> +                     continue;
> +
> +             kb->start_addr = (unsigned long)addr;
> +             symbol_name = kallsyms_lookup(kb->start_addr,
> +                             &size, &offset, &modname, namebuf);
> +             if (!symbol_name)
> +                     kb->range = 0;
> +             else
> +                     kb->range = size;
> +     }
> +
> +     /* This guarantee that who see initilized will
> +      * get a updated data of kprobe_blacklist */
> +     smp_wmb();
> +     kprobe_blacklist_initialized = true;
> +
> +out:
> +     mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex);
> +}
> +
>  static int __kprobes in_kprobes_functions(unsigned long addr)
>  {
>       struct kprobe_blackpoint *kb;
> @@ -1331,6 +1375,7 @@ static int __kprobes in_kprobes_functions(unsigned long 
> addr)
>       if (addr >= (unsigned long)__kprobes_text_start &&
>           addr < (unsigned long)__kprobes_text_end)
>               return -EINVAL;
> +
>       /*
>        * If there exists a kprobe_blacklist, verify and
>        * fail any probe registration in the prohibited area
> @@ -1476,6 +1521,9 @@ int __kprobes register_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
>       struct module *probed_mod;
>       kprobe_opcode_t *addr;
>  
> +     if (unlikely(!kprobe_blacklist_initialized))
> +             init_kprobe_blacklist();
> +
>       /* Adjust probe address from symbol */
>       addr = kprobe_addr(p);
>       if (IS_ERR(addr))
> @@ -2065,11 +2113,6 @@ static struct notifier_block kprobe_module_nb = {
>  static int __init init_kprobes(void)
>  {
>       int i, err = 0;
> -     unsigned long offset = 0, size = 0;
> -     char *modname, namebuf[128];
> -     const char *symbol_name;
> -     void *addr;
> -     struct kprobe_blackpoint *kb;
>  
>       /* FIXME allocate the probe table, currently defined statically */
>       /* initialize all list heads */
> @@ -2079,28 +2122,6 @@ static int __init init_kprobes(void)
>               raw_spin_lock_init(&(kretprobe_table_locks[i].lock));
>       }
>  
> -     /*
> -      * Lookup and populate the kprobe_blacklist.
> -      *
> -      * Unlike the kretprobe blacklist, we'll need to determine
> -      * the range of addresses that belong to the said functions,
> -      * since a kprobe need not necessarily be at the beginning
> -      * of a function.
> -      */
> -     for (kb = kprobe_blacklist; kb->name != NULL; kb++) {
> -             kprobe_lookup_name(kb->name, addr);
> -             if (!addr)
> -                     continue;
> -
> -             kb->start_addr = (unsigned long)addr;
> -             symbol_name = kallsyms_lookup(kb->start_addr,
> -                             &size, &offset, &modname, namebuf);
> -             if (!symbol_name)
> -                     kb->range = 0;
> -             else
> -                     kb->range = size;
> -     }
> -
>       if (kretprobe_blacklist_size) {
>               /* lookup the function address from its name */
>               for (i = 0; kretprobe_blacklist[i].name != NULL; i++) {
> 


-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
IT Management Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to