On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 01:53:49PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 12:52:06 +0400, Dmitry Monakhov <dmonak...@openvz.org>
> wrote:
> Non-text part: multipart/mixed
> > On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 16:22:41 -0700 (PDT), Christian Kujau
> > <li...@nerdbynature.de> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 at 02:05, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> > > > Please drop that patch and collect logs with a kernel which
> > > > has only 0001-enable-ES_AGGRESSIVE_TEST-V2.patch patch applied
> > Ok I have found at least one issue.
> Yeah.. My college advise me to use sparse in order to spot all
> cpu_to_ondisk format conversion
> make C=2 CF="-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__" fs/ext4/
> And it spotted a huge amount of issues. Which tell us that we are deeply
> in shit.
Yes, My college also suggest me that we should use sparse to check this
problem. I think the following patch could fix this bug.
Regards,
- Zheng
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix a big-endian bug when an extent is zeroed out
From: Zheng Liu <wenqing...@taobao.com>
When an extent was zeroed out, we forgot to do convert from cpu to le16.
It could make us hit a BUG_ON when we try to write dirty pages out. So
fix it.
Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing...@taobao.com>
---
fs/ext4/extents.c | 11 +++++++----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index e4a6844..2352467 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -2999,20 +2999,23 @@ static int ext4_split_extent_at(handle_t *handle,
if (split_flag & EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID1) {
err = ext4_ext_zeroout(inode, ex2);
zero_ex.ee_block = ex2->ee_block;
- zero_ex.ee_len = ext4_ext_get_actual_len(ex2);
+ zero_ex.ee_len = cpu_to_le16(
+ ext4_ext_get_actual_len(ex2));
ext4_ext_store_pblock(&zero_ex,
ext4_ext_pblock(ex2));
} else {
err = ext4_ext_zeroout(inode, ex);
zero_ex.ee_block = ex->ee_block;
- zero_ex.ee_len = ext4_ext_get_actual_len(ex);
+ zero_ex.ee_len = cpu_to_le16(
+ ext4_ext_get_actual_len(ex));
ext4_ext_store_pblock(&zero_ex,
ext4_ext_pblock(ex));
}
} else {
err = ext4_ext_zeroout(inode, &orig_ex);
zero_ex.ee_block = orig_ex.ee_block;
- zero_ex.ee_len = ext4_ext_get_actual_len(&orig_ex);
+ zero_ex.ee_len = cpu_to_le16(
+
ext4_ext_get_actual_len(&orig_ex));
ext4_ext_store_pblock(&zero_ex,
ext4_ext_pblock(&orig_ex));
}
@@ -3272,7 +3275,7 @@ static int ext4_ext_convert_to_initialized(handle_t
*handle,
if (err)
goto out;
zero_ex.ee_block = ex->ee_block;
- zero_ex.ee_len = ext4_ext_get_actual_len(ex);
+ zero_ex.ee_len = cpu_to_le16(ext4_ext_get_actual_len(ex));
ext4_ext_store_pblock(&zero_ex, ext4_ext_pblock(ex));
err = ext4_ext_get_access(handle, inode, path + depth);
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
