2013/4/3 Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org>: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Richard Genoud > <richard.gen...@gmail.com> wrote: >> 2013/3/28 Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org>: > >>> Again, pinconf_free_setting() is all about freeing any dynamically >>> allocated storage required to represent the setting itself; it's not >>> about (un-)programming HW. >>> >> got it. >> I'll change that > > I guess the incremental patches have fixed most issues pointed out > in this thread? Elese keep the add-on patches coming, as long as the > end result looks OK to both of you I'm happy too. Yes, I think we've covered it all. Tthe last patches are: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: select_state: don't call pinctrl_free_setting on error [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: simplify the re-enable old state code in pinctrl_select_state (sent and reviewed on 29 march.)
Best regards, Richard. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
