Hello,
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 10:05:37AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> calculate the node of the pool earlier, and allocate the pool
> from the node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <la...@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> kernel/workqueue.c | 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> index 737646d..3f33077 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ static int worker_pool_assign_id(struct worker_pool *pool)
> * @wq: the target workqueue
> * @node: the node ID
> *
> - * This must be called either with pwq_lock held or sched RCU read locked.
> + * This must be called either with wq->mutex held or sched RCU read locked.
It'd be nice to mention it in the patch description. Just add
something like "while at it, fix the wrong locking comment in XXX".
> @@ -3563,29 +3563,30 @@ static struct worker_pool *get_unbound_pool(const
> struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
> hash_for_each_possible(unbound_pool_hash, pool, hash_node, hash) {
> if (wqattrs_equal(pool->attrs, attrs)) {
> pool->refcnt++;
> - goto out_unlock;
> + goto out_pool;
return pool; ?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
