Quoting Peter De Schrijver (2013-04-04 01:20:44) > On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 01:23:05AM +0200, Stephen Warren wrote: > > On 04/03/2013 12:27 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > > > On 04/03/2013 11:52 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: > > >> On 04/03/2013 08:40 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > > >>> This is the nineth version of the Tegra114 clockframework. It is based > > >>> on the > > >>> next-20130320-fixed branch of > > >>> git://nv-tegra.nvidia.com/user/swarren/linux-2.6.git, > > > ... [it depends on] > > >>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/233415/ > > >> > > >> That is Joseph's "clocksource: tegra: enable arch_timer". Is this > > >> actually a dependency, or an optimization, or ...? > > >> > > >> Rob Herring objected to that patch since it isn't necessary if his > > >> series "ARM arch, sp804 and integrator timer CLKSRC_OF support" is > > >> applied. > > >> > > >> If I apply just your (Peter's) CCF series without Joseph's or Rob's > > >> patches, will everything still work, or is this a hard dependency to > > >> create a working system? > > > > > > I manage to get this series applied on top of my local dev branch, based > > > on next-20130328 (it was painful). Testing indicates that there is no > > > dependency on Joseph's patch mentioned above; I could boot, log in, and > > > play audio (with local patches) with /or/ without Joseph's patch applied. > > > > > > However, I still find that I need to revert f7db706 ARM: "7674/1: smp: > > > Avoid dummy clockevent being preferred over real hardware clock-event", > > > or I get a hard system hang right after the root fs is mounted. As such, > > > I not sure if it's worthwhile applying this series since it's unlikely > > > to actually work once merged into Torvalds' tree. > > > > > > Do you have any idea what the problem is here? > > > > > > I'll try rebasing my local test branch on top of the latest linux-next > > > just in case some other fix solved this already, but I'm not going to > > > hold my breath. > > > > I've found the problem. My bootloader wasn't initializing the TSC and > > hence I guess it wasn't working properly, even with Joseph's patch to > > add a call to the initialization function. > > > > Ok. > > > So, if I: > > > > a) Fix my bootloader to enable TSC. > > > > b) Merge Rob's patch series to enable the TSC. This is needed rather > > than Joseph's patch since the two conflict, and I assume that Rob's > > patch is going into 3.10. > > > > c) Undo my local revert of "ARM: 7674/1: smp: Avoid dummy clockevent > > being preferred over real hardware clock-event". > > > > Ok. Good. That's close to what I have and works here. As well. > > > ... then everything now works. > > > > So the only remaining issues are: > > > > 1) Should the mux clocks still be defined in the binding document? > > Prashant didn't seem to think so. > > > > I guess we should remove them then. > > > 2) I need Mike's ack to apply this series to the Tegra tree. > > Ok. Mike? >
Cool to see this come together! For the drivers/clk bits: Acked-by: Mike Turquette <mturque...@linaro.org> > Cheers, > > Peter. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/