On 04/04/2013 01:59 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> > - if (capacity && rq->nr_running == 1 && wl > env->imbalance)
>> > + if (rq->nr_running == 0 ||
>> > + (!(env->flags & LBF_POWER_BAL) && capacity &&
>> > + rq->nr_running == 1 && wl > env->imbalance))
> Just out of curious.
>
> In load_balance(), we only move normal tasks, right?
>
> Then shouldn't it check rq->cfs.h_nr_running rather than rq->nr_running?
Yes, it seems so.
What's your opinion of this, Peter?
--
Thanks
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
