I previously wrote:
> I will post a patch separately which handles a couple of cases where
> *_delete_inode() does not call clear_inode() in all cases.

OK, here it is.  The ext2_delete_inode() change isn't exactly a bug fix,
but rather a "performance" change.  No need to hold BLK to check status
or call clear_inode() (we call clear_inode() outside BLK in VFS if
delete_inode() method does not exist).

Cheers, Andreas
=======================================================================
diff -ru linux-2.4.4p1.orig/fs/ext2/inode.c linux/fs/ext2/inode.c
--- linux-2.4.4p1.orig/fs/ext2/inode.c  Tue Apr 10 16:44:49 2001
+++ linux/fs/ext2/inode.c       Fri Apr 27 13:51:15 2001
@@ -44,12 +47,12 @@
  */
 void ext2_delete_inode (struct inode * inode)
 {
-       lock_kernel();
-
        if (is_bad_inode(inode) ||
            inode->i_ino == EXT2_ACL_IDX_INO ||
            inode->i_ino == EXT2_ACL_DATA_INO)
                goto no_delete;
+
+       lock_kernel();
        inode->u.ext2_i.i_dtime = CURRENT_TIME;
        mark_inode_dirty(inode);
        ext2_update_inode(inode, IS_SYNC(inode));
@@ -59,9 +62,7 @@
        ext2_free_inode (inode);
 
        unlock_kernel();
        return;
 no_delete:
-       unlock_kernel();
        clear_inode(inode);     /* We must guarantee clearing of inode... */
 }
 
diff -ru linux-2.4.4p1.orig/fs/bfs/inode.c linux/fs/bfs/inode.c
--- linux-2.4.4p1.orig/fs/bfs/inode.c   Tue Apr 10 16:44:49 2001
+++ linux/fs/bfs/inode.c        Fri Apr 27 15:45:31 2001
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@
        if (is_bad_inode(inode) || inode->i_ino < BFS_ROOT_INO ||
            inode->i_ino > inode->i_sb->su_lasti) {
                printf("invalid ino=%08lx\n", inode->i_ino);
-               return;
+               goto bad_inode;
        }
        
        inode->i_size = 0;
@@ -155,8 +156,7 @@
        bh = bread(dev, block, BFS_BSIZE);
        if (!bh) {
                printf("Unable to read inode %s:%08lx\n", bdevname(dev), ino);
-               unlock_kernel();
-               return;
+               goto bad_unlock;
        }
        off = (ino - BFS_ROOT_INO)%BFS_INODES_PER_BLOCK;
        di = (struct bfs_inode *)bh->b_data + off;
@@ -178,7 +178,9 @@
                s->su_lf_eblk = inode->iu_sblock - 1;
                mark_buffer_dirty(s->su_sbh);
        }
+bad_unlock:
        unlock_kernel();
+bad_inode:
        clear_inode(inode);
 }
 
diff -ru linux-2.4.4p1.orig/fs/ufs/ialloc.c linux/fs/ufs/ialloc.c
--- linux-2.4.4p1.orig/fs/ufs/ialloc.c  Thu Nov 16 14:18:26 2000
+++ linux/fs/ufs/ialloc.c       Fri Apr 27 15:53:26 2001
@@ -82,6 +82,7 @@
        if (!((ino > 1) && (ino < (uspi->s_ncg * uspi->s_ipg )))) {
                ufs_warning(sb, "ufs_free_inode", "reserved inode or nonexistent inode 
%u\n", ino);
                unlock_super (sb);
+               clear_inode (inode);
                return;
        }
        
@@ -90,6 +91,7 @@
        ucpi = ufs_load_cylinder (sb, cg);
        if (!ucpi) {
                unlock_super (sb);
+               clear_inode (inode);
                return;
        }
        ucg = ubh_get_ucg(UCPI_UBH);
-- 
Andreas Dilger                               TurboLabs filesystem development
http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to