On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 03:10:00PM +0200, Stefan Bader wrote: > * that we limited the number of possible pages already to > * the number of pages in the large page. > */ > if (address == (address & pmask) && cpa->numpages == (psize >> > PAGE_SHIFT)) { > /* > * The address is aligned and the number of pages > * covers the full page. > */ > new_pte = pfn_pte(pte_pfn(old_pte), new_prot); > ^ > > This one. The first patch changed > > - new_pte = pfn_pte(pte_pfn(old_pte), canon_pgprot(new_prot)); > + new_pte = pfn_pte(pte_pfn(old_pte), new_prot); > > The fixup patch drops new_prot completely from being initialized and only > works > on req_prot. Probably it would be best to also drop the definition of > new_prot. > I think it then completely unused.
Actually, we do need and initialize new_prot at line 495: pfn = pte_pfn(old_pte) + ((address & (psize - 1)) >> PAGE_SHIFT); cpa->pfn = pfn; new_prot = static_protections(req_prot, address, pfn); <--- and we need it for the subsequent loop where we go over the 512 PTEs to decide whether to split or not. So it is needed after all, AFAICT. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/