On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Alexander Viro wrote:
>
> Fine with me. Actually in _all_ cases execept cdrom.c it's preceded by
> either sync_dev() or fsync_dev(). What do you think about pulling that
> into the same function?
I'd actually prefer not. I don't think it makes sense from a conceptual
standpoint, and I think drivers could validly say "syncing this device at
this point is _wrong_".
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] cleanup for fixing get_super() races Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] cleanup for fixing get_super() races Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH] cleanup for fixing get_super() races Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH] cleanup for fixing get_super() rac... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] cleanup for fixing get_super()... Alexander Viro
- [PATCH] (1 of 2) cleanup for fixing g... Alexander Viro
- [PATCH] (2 of 2) cleanup for fixing g... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH] cleanup for fixing get_super() rac... Martin Dalecki
- Re: [PATCH] cleanup for fixing get_super()... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH] cleanup for fixing get_su... Martin Dalecki
- Re: [PATCH] cleanup for fixing get_super() races Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] cleanup for fixing get_super() rac... Alexander Viro

