On Tue, 2013-04-02 at 05:13 +0200, Carsten Emde wrote: > Steven, > > I'm pleased to announce the 3.6.11.1-rt32 stable release. > Unfortunately, there is another compile error: > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c: In function ‘i915_gem_wait_for_error’: > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:118:3: warning: passing argument 1 of > ‘rt_spin_lock’ from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default] > In file included from include/linux/spinlock.h:273:0, > from include/linux/wait.h:24, > from include/linux/fs.h:396, > from include/drm/drmP.h:47, > from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:28: > include/linux/spinlock_rt.h:21:24: note: expected ‘struct spinlock_t *’ > but argument is of type ‘struct raw_spinlock_t *’ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:120:3: warning: passing argument 1 of > ‘rt_spin_unlock’ from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default] > In file included from include/linux/spinlock.h:273:0, > from include/linux/wait.h:24, > from include/linux/fs.h:396, > from include/drm/drmP.h:47, > from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:28: > include/linux/spinlock_rt.h:24:24: note: expected ‘struct spinlock_t *’ > but argument is of type ‘struct raw_spinlock_t *’ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c: In function ‘i915_gem_check_wedge’: > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:1890:3: warning: passing argument 1 of > ‘rt_spin_lock’ from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default] > In file included from include/linux/spinlock.h:273:0, > from include/linux/wait.h:24, > from include/linux/fs.h:396, > from include/drm/drmP.h:47, > from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:28: > include/linux/spinlock_rt.h:21:24: note: expected ‘struct spinlock_t *’ > but argument is of type ‘struct raw_spinlock_t *’ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:1892:3: warning: passing argument 1 of > ‘rt_spin_unlock’ from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default] > In file included from include/linux/spinlock.h:273:0, > from include/linux/wait.h:24, > from include/linux/fs.h:396, > from include/drm/drmP.h:47, > from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:28: > include/linux/spinlock_rt.h:24:24: note: expected ‘struct spinlock_t *’ > but argument is of type ‘struct raw_spinlock_t *’ > > I would propose to adopt the mechanism that Sebastian introduced in > 3.8.4-rt2 (https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/26/600). The kernel compiles > and runs without any problem with the below patch on a system that > requires the i915 driver module. >
Thanks Carsten, I'll be updating this later today. BTW, did you get any core dumps from the work queue race that we've been seeing? Thanks, -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
