On 04/09/2013 01:29 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 01:24:46PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 04/09/2013 01:05 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>>
>>>> So crashkernel=X@Y;high is a valid syntax? Looks like we will reserve
>>>> X amount of RAM at base Y and ignore "high" or "low".
>>>
>>> yes, we should reject them.
>>>
>>
>> What if there isn't X amount of RAM available at base Y?
>
> We don't reserve anything.
>
> In this context crashkernel=X@Y,high is invalid syntax and should probably
> be ignored by parser. The very fact user specified the offset, high or
> low option does not carry any meaning.
>
> crashkernel=X,high is valid though.
>
Yes, if the offset being invalid is an error, that is the right
behavior, I would think.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
