This patch looks like it should be in the 3.8-stable tree, should we apply
it?
------------------
From: "Vlad Yasevich <vyase...@redhat.com>"
commit 4543fbefe6e06a9e40d9f2b28d688393a299f079 upstream
A few drivers use dev_uc_sync/unsync to synchronize the
address lists from master down to slave/lower devices. In
some cases (bond/team) a single address list is synched down
to multiple devices. At the time of unsync, we have a leak
in these lower devices, because "synced" is treated as a
boolean and the address will not be unsynced for anything after
the first device/call.
Treat "synced" as a count (same as refcount) and allow all
unsync calls to work.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyase...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.c...@samsung.com>
---
include/linux/netdevice.h | 2 +-
net/core/dev_addr_lists.c | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index 9ef07d0..0e182f9 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -208,9 +208,9 @@ struct netdev_hw_addr {
#define NETDEV_HW_ADDR_T_SLAVE 3
#define NETDEV_HW_ADDR_T_UNICAST 4
#define NETDEV_HW_ADDR_T_MULTICAST 5
- bool synced;
bool global_use;
int refcount;
+ int synced;
struct rcu_head rcu_head;
};
diff --git a/net/core/dev_addr_lists.c b/net/core/dev_addr_lists.c
index b079c7b..7841d87 100644
--- a/net/core/dev_addr_lists.c
+++ b/net/core/dev_addr_lists.c
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static int __hw_addr_create_ex(struct netdev_hw_addr_list
*list,
ha->type = addr_type;
ha->refcount = 1;
ha->global_use = global;
- ha->synced = false;
+ ha->synced = 0;
list_add_tail_rcu(&ha->list, &list->list);
list->count++;
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ int __hw_addr_sync(struct netdev_hw_addr_list *to_list,
addr_len, ha->type);
if (err)
break;
- ha->synced = true;
+ ha->synced++;
ha->refcount++;
} else if (ha->refcount == 1) {
__hw_addr_del(to_list, ha->addr, addr_len,
ha->type);
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ void __hw_addr_unsync(struct netdev_hw_addr_list
*to_list,
if (ha->synced) {
__hw_addr_del(to_list, ha->addr,
addr_len, ha->type);
- ha->synced = false;
+ ha->synced--;
__hw_addr_del(from_list, ha->addr,
addr_len, ha->type);
}
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
