On 04/10/2013 09:33 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 06:19 +0000, Jason Wang wrote:
>> Currently, for the packets receives from netback, before doing header check,
>> kernel just reset the transport header in netif_receive_skb() which pretends 
>> non
>> l4 header. This is suboptimal for precise packet length estimation 
>> (introduced
>> in 1def9238: net_sched: more precise pkt_len computation) which needs 
>> correct l4
>> header for gso packets.
>>
>> The patch just reuse the header probed by netback for partial checksum 
>> packets
>> and tries to use skb_flow_dissect() for other cases, if both fail, just 
>> pretend
>> no l4 header.
>>
>> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>
>> Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c |   12 ++++++++++++
>>  1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c 
>> b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
>> index aa28550..fc8faa7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
>> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/udp.h>
>>  
>>  #include <net/tcp.h>
>> +#include <net/flow_keys.h>
>>  
>>  #include <xen/xen.h>
>>  #include <xen/events.h>
>> @@ -1184,6 +1185,7 @@ static int checksum_setup(struct xenvif *vif, struct 
>> sk_buff *skb)
>>      if (th >= skb_tail_pointer(skb))
>>              goto out;
>>  
>> +    skb_set_transport_header(skb, 4 * iph->ihl);
>>      skb->csum_start = th - skb->head;
> Should the use of th here (and perhaps above) be replaced with
> skb_transport_header() too?

Yes, and furthermore looks like we can use skb_partial_csum_set() here,
will send a patch.

Thanks
>>      switch (iph->protocol) {
>>      case IPPROTO_TCP:
>> @@ -1495,6 +1497,7 @@ static void xen_netbk_tx_submit(struct xen_netbk 
>> *netbk)
>>  
>>              skb->dev      = vif->dev;
>>              skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, skb->dev);
>> +            skb_reset_network_header(skb);
>>  
>>              if (checksum_setup(vif, skb)) {
>>                      netdev_dbg(vif->dev,
>> @@ -1503,6 +1506,15 @@ static void xen_netbk_tx_submit(struct xen_netbk 
>> *netbk)
>>                      continue;
>>              }
>>  
>> +            if (!skb_transport_header_was_set(skb)) {
>> +                    struct flow_keys keys;
>> +
>> +                    if (skb_flow_dissect(skb, &keys))
>> +                            skb_set_transport_header(skb, keys.thoff);
>> +                    else
>> +                            skb_reset_transport_header(skb);
>> +            }
>> +
>>              vif->dev->stats.rx_bytes += skb->len;
>>              vif->dev->stats.rx_packets++;
>>  
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to