3.6.11.2 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: fanchaoting <fanchaot...@cn.fujitsu.com>

[ Upstream commit 4376c94618c26225e69e17b7c91169c45a90b292 ]

when pnfs block using device mapper,if umounting later,it maybe
cause oops. we apply "1 + sizeof(bl_umount_request)" memory for
msg->data, the memory maybe overflow when we do "memcpy(&dataptr
[sizeof(bl_msg)], &bl_umount_request, sizeof(bl_umount_request))",
because the size of bl_msg is more than 1 byte.

Signed-off-by: fanchaoting<fanchaot...@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.mykleb...@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>
---
 fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayoutdm.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayoutdm.c 
b/fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayoutdm.c
index 737d839..6fc7b5c 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayoutdm.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayoutdm.c
@@ -55,7 +55,8 @@ static void dev_remove(struct net *net, dev_t dev)
 
        bl_pipe_msg.bl_wq = &nn->bl_wq;
        memset(msg, 0, sizeof(*msg));
-       msg->data = kzalloc(1 + sizeof(bl_umount_request), GFP_NOFS);
+       msg->len = sizeof(bl_msg) + bl_msg.totallen;
+       msg->data = kzalloc(msg->len, GFP_NOFS);
        if (!msg->data)
                goto out;
 
@@ -66,7 +67,6 @@ static void dev_remove(struct net *net, dev_t dev)
        memcpy(msg->data, &bl_msg, sizeof(bl_msg));
        dataptr = (uint8_t *) msg->data;
        memcpy(&dataptr[sizeof(bl_msg)], &bl_umount_request, 
sizeof(bl_umount_request));
-       msg->len = sizeof(bl_msg) + bl_msg.totallen;
 
        add_wait_queue(&nn->bl_wq, &wq);
        if (rpc_queue_upcall(nn->bl_device_pipe, msg) < 0) {
-- 
1.7.10.4


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to