From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Given the changes that introduce note_gp_change(), rcu_start_gp_per_cpu()
is now a trivial wrapper function with only one caller. This commit
therefore inlines it into its sole call site.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcutree.c | 14 +-------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index f6cf5e1..0848341 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -1298,18 +1298,6 @@ static void note_gp_changes(struct rcu_state *rsp,
struct rcu_data *rdp)
}
/*
- * Do per-CPU grace-period initialization for running CPU. The caller
- * must hold the lock of the leaf rcu_node structure corresponding to
- * this CPU.
- */
-static void
-rcu_start_gp_per_cpu(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp, struct
rcu_data *rdp)
-{
- /* Set state so that this CPU will detect the next quiescent state. */
- __note_gp_changes(rsp, rnp, rdp);
-}
-
-/*
* Initialize a new grace period.
*/
static int rcu_gp_init(struct rcu_state *rsp)
@@ -1357,7 +1345,7 @@ static int rcu_gp_init(struct rcu_state *rsp)
WARN_ON_ONCE(rnp->completed != rsp->completed);
ACCESS_ONCE(rnp->completed) = rsp->completed;
if (rnp == rdp->mynode)
- rcu_start_gp_per_cpu(rsp, rnp, rdp);
+ __note_gp_changes(rsp, rnp, rdp);
rcu_preempt_boost_start_gp(rnp);
trace_rcu_grace_period_init(rsp->name, rnp->gpnum,
rnp->level, rnp->grplo,
--
1.8.1.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
