On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Paul Gortmaker
<paul.gortma...@windriver.com> wrote:
> On 13-04-18 07:14 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 11:33 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> * Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortma...@windriver.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Recent activity has had a focus on moving functionally related blocks of
>>>> stuff
>>>> out of sched/core.c into stand-alone files. The code relating to load
>>>> average
>>>> calculations has grown significantly enough recently to warrant placing it
>>>> in a
>>>> separate file.
>>>>
>>>> Here we do that, and in doing so, we shed ~20k of code from sched/core.c
>>>> (~10%).
>>>>
>>>> A couple small static functions in the core sched.h header were also
>>>> localized
>>>> to their singular user in sched/fair.c at the same time, with the goal to
>>>> also
>>>> reduce the amount of "broadcast" content in that sched.h file.
>>>
>>> Nice!
>>>
>>> Peter, is this (and the naming of the new file) fine with you too?
>>
>> Yes and no.. that is I do like the change, but I don't like the
>> filename. We have _waaaay_ too many different things we call load_avg.
>>
>> That said, I'm having a somewhat hard time coming up with a coherent
>> alternative :/
>
> Several of the relocated functions start their name with "calc_load..."
> Does "calc_load.c" sound any better?
>
How about sched_load.c ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
