* Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote:
> OK,.. Ingo said that pipe-test was the original motivation for
> wake_affine() and since that's currently broken to pieces due to
> select_idle_sibling() is there still a benefit to having it at all?
>
> Can anybody find any significant regression when simply killing
> wake_affine()?
I'd suggest doing a patch that does:
s/SD_WAKE_AFFINE/0*SD_WAKE_AFFINE
in all the relevant toplogy.h files, but otherwise keep the logic in
place. That way it's easy to revert.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
