On 04/22/13 08:34, Mark Rutland wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 01:29:02AM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> This is what I was thinking. I don't see why we can't move this to generic >> code and have arm64 use it too. Those patches will follow once I find an >> arm64 compiler. >> >> First two patches should probably go in even if the 64 bit stuff doesn't go >> in >> at the same time. >> >> Stephen Boyd (4): >> ARM: sched_clock: Remove unused needs_suspend member >> ARM: sched_clock: Return suspended count earlier >> ARM: sched_clock: Add support for >32 bit sched_clock >> ARM: arch_timer: Move to setup_sched_clock_64() >> >> arch/arm/include/asm/sched_clock.h | 5 +- >> arch/arm/kernel/arch_timer.c | 14 +---- >> arch/arm/kernel/sched_clock.c | 111 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- >> 3 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) > I wanted to look at the series with more context, but I don't seem to be able > to apply patch 2 and beyond to my tree, and I couldn't figure out what tree > this series was based on. > > What do I need to use as the base for this series?
These are based on next-20130419. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
