On 2013年04月23日 07:04, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:39:06 +0800 Chen Gang <gang.c...@asianux.com> wrote:
> 
>>
>> in audit_trim_trees(), has called get_tree() before failure occurs,
>> so need also call put_tree after go to skip_it:
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/kernel/audit_tree.c
>> +++ b/kernel/audit_tree.c
>> @@ -617,10 +617,10 @@ void audit_trim_trees(void)
>>              }
>>              spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
>>              trim_marked(tree);
>> -            put_tree(tree);
>>              drop_collected_mounts(root_mnt);
>>  skip_it:
>>              mutex_lock(&audit_filter_mutex);
>> +            put_tree(tree);
>>      }
>>      list_del(&cursor);
>>      mutex_unlock(&audit_filter_mutex);
> 
> That looks right to me.
> 
> I think we can micro-optimise the code by performing the put_tree()
> before taking the mutex, to slightly reduce mutex hold times?
> 

  ok, thanks.

> --- 
> a/kernel/audit_tree.c~kernel-audit_treec-tree-will-leak-memory-when-failure-occurs-in-audit_trim_trees-fix
> +++ a/kernel/audit_tree.c
> @@ -619,8 +619,8 @@ void audit_trim_trees(void)
>               trim_marked(tree);
>               drop_collected_mounts(root_mnt);
>  skip_it:
> -             mutex_lock(&audit_filter_mutex);
>               put_tree(tree);
> +             mutex_lock(&audit_filter_mutex);
>       }
>       list_del(&cursor);
>       mutex_unlock(&audit_filter_mutex);
> _
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Chen Gang

Asianux Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to