Hello, On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 12:16 AM, Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > The patch made index_of() weaker! > > It's probably all a bit academic, given that linux-next does > > -/* > - * This function must be completely optimized away if a constant is passed to > - * it. Mostly the same as what is in linux/slab.h except it returns an > index. > - */ > -static __always_inline int index_of(const size_t size) > -{ > - extern void __bad_size(void); > - > - if (__builtin_constant_p(size)) { > - int i = 0; > - > -#define CACHE(x) \ > - if (size <=x) \ > - return i; \ > - else \ > - i++; > -#include <linux/kmalloc_sizes.h> > -#undef CACHE > - __bad_size(); > - } else > - __bad_size(); > - return 0; > -} > -
Yup, Christoph nuked it in the following commit: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/penberg/linux.git/commit/?h=slab/next&id=2c59dd6544212faa5ce761920d2251f4152f408d Pekka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/