3.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Dmitry Popov <d...@highloadlab.com>
[ Upstream commit d66954a066158781ccf9c13c91d0316970fe57b6 ]
There is a bug in cookie_v4_check (net/ipv4/syncookies.c):
flowi4_init_output(&fl4, 0, sk->sk_mark, RT_CONN_FLAGS(sk),
RT_SCOPE_UNIVERSE, IPPROTO_TCP,
inet_sk_flowi_flags(sk),
(opt && opt->srr) ? opt->faddr : ireq->rmt_addr,
ireq->loc_addr, th->source, th->dest);
Here we do not respect sk->sk_bound_dev_if, therefore wrong dst_entry may be
taken. This dst_entry is used by new socket (get_cookie_sock ->
tcp_v4_syn_recv_sock), so its packets may take the wrong path.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Popov <d...@highloadlab.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
net/ipv4/syncookies.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/net/ipv4/syncookies.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/syncookies.c
@@ -345,8 +345,8 @@ struct sock *cookie_v4_check(struct sock
* hasn't changed since we received the original syn, but I see
* no easy way to do this.
*/
- flowi4_init_output(&fl4, 0, sk->sk_mark, RT_CONN_FLAGS(sk),
- RT_SCOPE_UNIVERSE, IPPROTO_TCP,
+ flowi4_init_output(&fl4, sk->sk_bound_dev_if, sk->sk_mark,
+ RT_CONN_FLAGS(sk), RT_SCOPE_UNIVERSE, IPPROTO_TCP,
inet_sk_flowi_flags(sk),
(opt && opt->srr) ? opt->faddr : ireq->rmt_addr,
ireq->loc_addr, th->source, th->dest);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
