On 04/29/13 02:17, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20130426: >
(who is responsible for MEM_SOFT_DIRTY?) on x86_64: warning: (HWPOISON_INJECT && MEM_SOFT_DIRTY) selects PROC_PAGE_MONITOR which has unmet direct dependencies (PROC_FS && MMU) because MEM_SOFT_DIRTY selects PROC_PAGE_MONITOR when CONFIG_PROC_FS is not enabled. Can MEM_SOFT_DIRTY depend on PROC_FS? and the help text for MEM_SOFT_DIRTY refers to Documentation/vm/soft-dirty.txt, which does not exist. Please add the file. -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
