Re: iso9660 endianness cleanup patch

[Mike Galbraith]

On Thu, 3 May 2001, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:

> Pavel Machek writes:
>
> > It  should ot break anything. gcc decides its bad to inline it, so it
> > does not inline it. Small code growth at worst. Compiler has right to
> > make your code bigger or slower, if it decides to do so.
>
> Oh come on. The logical way:
>
> inline          Compiler must inline (only!) or report an error.

That's doable now.. if the code is otherwise warning free.

        -Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/