Don't acquire ashmem_mutex in ashmem_shrink if we've somehow recursed into the
shrinker code from within ashmem. Just bail out, avoiding a deadlock. This is
fine, as ashmem cache pruning is advisory anyhow.

Signed-off-by: Robert Love <rl...@google.com>
---
 drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c b/drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c
index e681bdd..82c6768 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c
@@ -363,7 +363,11 @@ static int ashmem_shrink(struct shrinker *s, struct 
shrink_control *sc)
        if (!sc->nr_to_scan)
                return lru_count;
 
-       mutex_lock(&ashmem_mutex);
+       /* avoid recursing into this code from within ashmem itself */
+       if (!mutex_trylock(&ashmem_mutex)) {
+               return -1;
+       }
+
        list_for_each_entry_safe(range, next, &ashmem_lru_list, lru) {
                loff_t start = range->pgstart * PAGE_SIZE;
                loff_t end = (range->pgend + 1) * PAGE_SIZE;
-- 
1.8.2.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to