On Thu, 2 May 2013, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 20:27 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c > > index d30042e..8f040a0 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c > > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ > > #include <xen/xen-ops.h> > > #include <asm/xen/hypervisor.h> > > #include <asm/xen/hypercall.h> > > +#include <asm/arch_timer.h> > > #include <asm/system_misc.h> > > #include <linux/interrupt.h> > > #include <linux/irqreturn.h> > > @@ -172,6 +173,8 @@ static int __init xen_secondary_init(unsigned int cpu) > > later ones fail to. */ > > per_cpu(xen_vcpu, cpu) = vcpup; > > } > > + > > + xen_setup_runstate_info(cpu); > > Is this called for the boot processor too?
Yep. > (do you have a linux-next branch where I can easily find the baseline > for this series?) git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sstabellini/xen.git lost_ticks_1 It's based on my 3.9-rc3-smp-6 branch currently in linux-next (that is based on 3.9-rc3). However lost_ticks_1 is not in linux-next yet. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
