* Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote: > > I meant to add that I think it would be more productive if we (you and I) > > were > > to work on the library to extend it with external text-based event tables > > that > > could be used by perf either directly or thru the libpfm4 interface. > > That would be very useful indeed.. I think we talked about this before. > Also wasn't there some vendor support for this idea as well? > > I think we want a format that is relatively simple to parse and human > readable (which excludes XML on both counts ;-). > > The main objection of using libpfm4 has always been that its primarily > something else. It also does the event listing thing, but that's only a > small part of it. > > But if we can split out that part and use it in both projects that would > be best I think.
If that libpfm reference library moved to tools/lib/ like tools/lib/traceevents/ then that would be a nice, useful solution indeed. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/