On Saturday, May 04, 2013 03:23:30 PM Colin Cross wrote: > On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org> wrote: > > Hello, Rafael. > > > > On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <r...@sisk.pl> wrote: > >>> Heh, so you are aware of the deadlock possibilities. Good selection > >>> of spots. For all the conversion patches. > >>> > >>> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org> > >> > >> I wonder if that includes [3/10] (just to get the record straight)? > > > > I think we want the lockdep annotations before these go in. I'll > > review Colin's new series later today. > > Just to make sure the merge order is clear, the two patches I posted > yesterday to reintroduce the lockdep warning in try_to_freeze() > (https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/3/488) need to be merged first, then I > will repost this series on top of that one.
OK, thanks for the clarification. Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
