* Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> wrote:

> 
> * Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortma...@windriver.com> wrote:
> 
> > Recent activity has had a focus on moving functionally related blocks of
> > stuff out of sched/core.c into stand-alone files.  The code relating to load
> > calculations has grown significantly enough recently to warrant placing it 
> > in
> > a separate file.
> > 
> > Here we do that, and in doing so, we shed ~20k of code from sched/core.c 
> > (~10%).
> > 
> > A couple small static functions in the core sched.h header were also 
> > localized
> > to their singular user in sched/fair.c at the same time, with the goal to 
> > also
> > reduce the amount of "broadcast" content in that sched.h file.
> > 
> > Paul.
> > ---
> > 
> > v2 changes:
> > 
> >   1) rebase from tip's sched/core (v3.9-rc1-38-gb329fd5) to today's
> >      tip master (v3.9-rc6-2031-g27f8b76).
> >   2) rename file from load_avg.c to proc.c
> 
> Thanks, looks good to me. Note, I'll try to apply this after the initial 
> round of trees went to Linus in the merge window, to reduce interactions 
> between the trees. [...]

Ok, all relevant trees are now upstream - mind sending a refreshed series 
against upstream merge commit 534c97b0950b or later?

Thanks,

        Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to