On Sat, 5 May 2001, Mitch Adair wrote: > Wouldn't that be lot of the same issues as a "swapoff" with some > portion of that in use? (except for the kernel data case of > course...) Basically, yes. regards, Rik -- Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose... http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ Send all your spam to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (spam digging piggy) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] CPU hot swap for 2.4.3 + s390 support Peter Rival
- Re: [PATCH] CPU hot swap for 2.4.3 + s390 supp... Peter Rival
- Re: [PATCH] CPU hot swap for 2.4.3 + s390 supp... Aaron Lehmann
- Re: [PATCH] CPU hot swap for 2.4.3 + s390 ... Stephen Beynon
- Re: [PATCH] CPU hot swap for 2.4.3 + s390 support Dwayne C. Litzenberger
- Re: [PATCH] CPU hot swap for 2.4.3 + s390 supp... Aaron Lehmann
- Re: [PATCH] CPU hot swap for 2.4.3 + s390 supp... Ben Ford
- Re: [PATCH] CPU hot swap for 2.4.3 + s390 ... Jakob Østergaard
- Re: [PATCH] CPU hot swap for 2.4.3 + s... Bruce Harada
- Re: [PATCH] CPU hot swap for 2.4.3 + s390 support Mitch Adair
- Re: [PATCH] CPU hot swap for 2.4.3 + s390 supp... Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] CPU hot swap for 2.4.3 + s390 support Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] CPU hot swap for 2.4.3 + s390 supp... David Woodhouse
- Re: [PATCH] CPU hot swap for 2.4.3 + s390 support Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] CPU hot swap for 2.4.3 + s390 support Rik van Riel