3.6.11.3 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit f1923820c447e986a9da0fc6bf60c1dccdf0408e ]

The valid mask for both offcore_response_0 and
offcore_response_1 was wrong for SNB/SNB-EP,
IVB/IVB-EP. It was possible to write to
reserved bit and cause a GP fault crashing
the kernel.

This patch fixes the problem by correctly marking the
reserved bits in the valid mask for all the processors
mentioned above.

A distinction between desktop and server parts is introduced
because bits 24-30 are only available on the server parts.

This version of the  patch is just a rebase to perf/urgent tree
and should apply to older kernels as well.

Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c |   20 ++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c 
b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index 6bca492..5e6b361 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -128,8 +128,14 @@ static struct event_constraint 
intel_gen_event_constraints[] __read_mostly =
 };
 
 static struct extra_reg intel_snb_extra_regs[] __read_mostly = {
-       INTEL_EVENT_EXTRA_REG(0xb7, MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_0, 0x3fffffffffull, RSP_0),
-       INTEL_EVENT_EXTRA_REG(0xbb, MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_1, 0x3fffffffffull, RSP_1),
+       INTEL_EVENT_EXTRA_REG(0xb7, MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_0, 0x3f807f8fffull, RSP_0),
+       INTEL_EVENT_EXTRA_REG(0xbb, MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_1, 0x3f807f8fffull, RSP_1),
+       EVENT_EXTRA_END
+};
+
+static struct extra_reg intel_snbep_extra_regs[] __read_mostly = {
+       INTEL_EVENT_EXTRA_REG(0xb7, MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_0, 0x3fffff8fffull, RSP_0),
+       INTEL_EVENT_EXTRA_REG(0xbb, MSR_OFFCORE_RSP_1, 0x3fffff8fffull, RSP_1),
        EVENT_EXTRA_END
 };
 
@@ -2058,7 +2064,10 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
                x86_pmu.event_constraints = intel_snb_event_constraints;
                x86_pmu.pebs_constraints = intel_snb_pebs_event_constraints;
                x86_pmu.pebs_aliases = intel_pebs_aliases_snb;
-               x86_pmu.extra_regs = intel_snb_extra_regs;
+               if (boot_cpu_data.x86_model == 45)
+                       x86_pmu.extra_regs = intel_snbep_extra_regs;
+               else
+                       x86_pmu.extra_regs = intel_snb_extra_regs;
                /* all extra regs are per-cpu when HT is on */
                x86_pmu.er_flags |= ERF_HAS_RSP_1;
                x86_pmu.er_flags |= ERF_NO_HT_SHARING;
@@ -2083,7 +2092,10 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
                x86_pmu.event_constraints = intel_snb_event_constraints;
                x86_pmu.pebs_constraints = intel_ivb_pebs_event_constraints;
                x86_pmu.pebs_aliases = intel_pebs_aliases_snb;
-               x86_pmu.extra_regs = intel_snb_extra_regs;
+               if (boot_cpu_data.x86_model == 62)
+                       x86_pmu.extra_regs = intel_snbep_extra_regs;
+               else
+                       x86_pmu.extra_regs = intel_snb_extra_regs;
                /* all extra regs are per-cpu when HT is on */
                x86_pmu.er_flags |= ERF_HAS_RSP_1;
                x86_pmu.er_flags |= ERF_NO_HT_SHARING;
-- 
1.7.10.4


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to