On Mon, 6 May 2013, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Christoph Lameter <c...@linux.com> wrote: > > - for (i = KMALLOC_SHIFT_LOW; i < KMALLOC_SHIFT_HIGH; i++) > > This didn't match what I had in my tree. I fixed it by hand but please > verify the end result: > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/penberg/linux.git/commit/?h=slab/next&id=8a965b3baa89ffedc73c0fbc750006c631012ced > Well this is because you did not take the patch that changed the way KMALLOC_SHIFT_HIGH is treated.
The patch above looks fine though. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
