On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 07:36:28PM +0900, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2013-05-06 (월), 23:15 +0800, Haicheng Li:
> > if (nm_i->fcnt > 2 * MAX_FREE_NIDS)
> > - return 0;
> > + return -1;
>
> We should check all the handler of add_free_nid().
yes, sorry that I missed double checking it while rebasing this patch
from master to dev branch, since there is only one handler on the master branch.
> So, plz see the below modified patch.
> > + if (blk_addr == NULL_ADDR) {
> > + cnt = add_free_nid(nm_i, start_nid);
> > + if (cnt < 0)
> > + break;
> > + }
>
> Here we need to eliminate cnt.
sure, harmless & can reduce the code line.
and the below patch looks good to me. Thanks.
> -----
> From e2da02f0ba045f792d166ac8215d04474c06f319 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Haicheng Li <haicheng...@linux.intel.com>
> Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 23:15:43 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: optimize scan_nat_page()
> Cc: linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
> linux-f2fs-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
>
> When nm_i->fcnt > 2 * MAX_FREE_NIDS, stop scanning other NAT entries.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haicheng Li <haicheng...@linux.intel.com>
> [Jaegeuk Kim: fix handling the return value of add_free_nid()]
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk....@samsung.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/node.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> index 122200e..e42934e 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> @@ -1254,7 +1254,7 @@ static int add_free_nid(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
> nid_t nid)
> struct free_nid *i;
>
> if (nm_i->fcnt > 2 * MAX_FREE_NIDS)
> - return 0;
> + return -1;
>
> /* 0 nid should not be used */
> if (nid == 0)
> @@ -1302,12 +1302,16 @@ static void scan_nat_page(struct f2fs_nm_info
> *nm_i,
> i = start_nid % NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK;
>
> for (; i < NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK; i++, start_nid++) {
> +
> if (start_nid >= nm_i->max_nid)
> break;
> - blk_addr = le32_to_cpu(nat_blk->entries[i].block_addr);
> +
> + blk_addr = le32_to_cpu(nat_blk->entries[i].block_addr);
> BUG_ON(blk_addr == NEW_ADDR);
> - if (blk_addr == NULL_ADDR)
> - add_free_nid(nm_i, start_nid);
> + if (blk_addr == NULL_ADDR) {
> + if (add_free_nid(nm_i, start_nid) < 0)
> + break;
> + }
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1655,7 +1659,7 @@ flush_now:
> }
>
> if (nat_get_blkaddr(ne) == NULL_ADDR &&
> - !add_free_nid(NM_I(sbi), nid)) {
> + add_free_nid(NM_I(sbi), nid) <= 0) {
> write_lock(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
> __del_from_nat_cache(nm_i, ne);
> write_unlock(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
> --
> 1.8.1.3.566.gaa39828
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
