Chao Xie <chao....@marvell.com> writes: > This patch have something wrong. > 1.The pxa_sync_time API is not needed. The RTC sync can be done > by user space applications, so in kernel this API is not needed. > 2.The pxa_rtc_open can not be deleted. This change has been > declined during review at the mail list > 3.Based on specification and talked with owner of driver, it > does not matter to set WOM and DOW. > > Only need to keep PSBR control for pxa95x > > This reverts commit 57489fabb7f3fc02483df2125fdbfb8b1bb1fcd8.
This commit doesn't exist in Linus's tree. Maybe in linux-next ? Anyway, as you are reverting, please consider this : the commit that exists is : c4243de70f7d536d95196b8a31539298bb15238c "drivers/rtc/rtc-pxa.c: drivers/rtc/rtc-pxa.c: fix alarm not match issue". This commit should be reverted : - because it's wrong : > tm->tm_wday = ((rycr & RDxR_DOW_MASK) >> RDxR_DOW_S) - 1; See how RYCR is used with a RDCR mask ... - because as maintainer I have already nacked this kind of patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1819851/ The reasons given here are still valid AFAIK. I'm pretty sure I didn't receive this patch in my mailbox. After I refused ChaoXie first patch, the second "same approach" patch from Liangs was sent in my back. I don't understand how that could happen ... Liangs, please make sure to add me to the reviewers next time ? Cheers. -- Robert -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/