Rafael, Thanks for your feedback.
> The way the changes are described here isn't particularly clear to me. I will try to make it a little more clear. > Also, since aer_recover_work_func() is going to be the only existing > caller of > cper_print_aer() after this change, as far as I can say, and it doesn't > use the > function's first argument, that argument should be dropped entirely. The truth is, the function cper_print_aer() really needs to be re-written so it is consistent with aer_print_error() in how it outputs information. Right now, the output is formatted very differently. I was planning on doing that at a later date, but fix the warning now. I might add a TODO comment in the code for this. The reason I did not remove the argument in cper_print_aer() is because 'prefix' is used in the call to cper_print_bits(), and I passed through an empty string to make sure that function worked correctly. I can try to clean it up. Lance
