comment based on changelog of d209a699a0b975ad

Signed-off-by: Andreas Fenkart <andreas.fenk...@streamunlimited.com>
---
 kernel/irq/chip.c |   13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/irq/chip.c b/kernel/irq/chip.c
index cbd97ce..4e3c439 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/chip.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c
@@ -213,6 +213,19 @@ void irq_enable(struct irq_desc *desc)
        irq_state_clr_masked(desc);
 }
 
+/**
+ * irq_disable - mask interupt disabled
+ * @desc:              irq descriptor which should be disabled
+ *
+ * If the chip does not implement the irq_disable callback, we
+ * use a lazy disable approach. That means we mark the interrupt
+ * disabled, but leave the hardware unmasked. That's an
+ * optimization because we avoid the hardware access for the
+ * common case where no interrupt happens after we marked it
+ * disabled. If an interrupt happens, then the interrupt flow
+ * handler masks the line at the hardware level and marks it
+ * pending.
+ */
 void irq_disable(struct irq_desc *desc)
 {
        irq_state_set_disabled(desc);
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to