On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 03:13:24PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> @@ -1751,7 +1751,7 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct
> net_device *slave_dev)
> read_lock(&bond->lock);
>
> new_slave->last_arp_rx = jiffies -
> - (msecs_to_jiffies(bond->params.arp_interval) + 1);
> + (msecs_to_jiffies_min(bond->params.arp_interval));
>
> if (bond->params.miimon && !bond->params.use_carrier) {
> link_reporting = bond_check_dev_link(bond, slave_dev, 1);
This "+ 1" was actually meant as "plus one". We need to ensure that
slave->last_arp_rx + msecs_to_jiffies(bond->params.arp_interval)
is strictly less than current value of jiffies. So with proposed
definition of msecs_to_jiffies_min() it works correctly but if the
implementation ever changes in such way that
msecs_to_jiffies_min(x) >= msecs_to_jiffies(x)
for some value of x, the code would be incorrect.
Michal Kubeček
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
