On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 03:50:16PM +0200, Stephen GALLIMORE wrote: > Greg, having looked at this we have concluded that we should just go > dynamic, as others have mentioned with udev on a full system or > devtmpfs on a minimal initramfs system there is no reason to use a > static major/minor. However the view here is that we would prefer to > keep the unique name, as for example the lantiq driver which is also > dynamic does, for the reason previously mentioned regarding PCIe > cards.
Why do you want your own name? > Is that acceptable? I would prefer not to use a new serial port name, as this is only going to make it harder for me to delete that name in the next year :) Sorry, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
