> No, I broke it when copying the ncpfs dircache code.
> 
> That code will reuse an old inode if it already exists (and thus also
> any pages attached to it), which is what I wanted and should be fine
> except that it needs to invalidate_inode_pages() if something changed.
> 
> Xuan and James, you have both seen this bug with smbfs not properly
> handling changes made on the server. Could you please test this patch
> vs 2.4.4 and let me know if it helps or not.
> 
> http://www.hojdpunkten.ac.se/054/samba/smbfs-2.4.4-truncate+retry-4.patch

Urban:

I am actually using a 2.4.3 kernel, rather than 2.4.4. However, I 
manually applied the patches to my 2.4.3 kernel, and did some tests - 
it appears to work now!

I probably won't be using Samba heavily until next week, but I will let 
you know if I see any evidence that the problem is not fixed.

Thank you very much for the fix.

-- James


----------------------------------------
James H. Puttick

Kerr Vayne Systems Ltd.
1 Valleywood Drive, Unit 5A
Markham, Ontario L3R 5L9
Canada

+1 905 475 6161  office
+1 905 479 9833  fax

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to