In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>
> Jonathan Morton writes:
> > >- page_count(page) == (1 + !!page->buffers));
> >
> > Two inversions in a row?
>
> It is the most straightforward way to make a '1' or '0'
> integer from the NULL state of a pointer.
Overall, I'd have to say that this:
- dead_swap_page =
- (PageSwapCache(page) &&
- page_count(page) == (1 + !!page->buffers));
-
Is nicer as:
int dead_swap_page = 0;
if (PageSwapCache(page)
&& page_count(page) == (page->buffers ? 1 : 2))
dead_swap_page = 1;
After all, the second is what the code *means* (1 and 2 are magic
numbers).
That said, anyone who doesn't understand the former should probably
get some more C experience before commenting on others' code...
Rusty.
--
Premature optmztion is rt of all evl. --DK
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
