On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 06:13:34PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > We don't want to back out the RCU_FAST_NO_HZ changes due to their
> > energy-efficiency benefits.
> 
> Yes, that's what I assumed.  Just didn't know where to start dissecting
> it...
> 
> >  So could you please try out Borislav's
> > patch below?  He ran into the same issue a few weeks ago, and this
> > one fixed it for him.
> >
> >                                                     Thanx, Paul
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > rcu: Expedite grace periods during suspend/resume
> >
> > CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ can increase grace-period durations by up to
> > a factor of four, which can result in long suspend and resume times.
> > Thus, this commit temporarily switches to expedited grace periods when
> > suspending the box and return to normal settings when resuming.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
> > index a9610d1..d9604a4 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> > @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/delay.h>
> >  #include <linux/stop_machine.h>
> >  #include <linux/random.h>
> > +#include <linux/suspend.h>
> >  
> >  #include "rcutree.h"
> >  #include <trace/events/rcu.h>
> > @@ -3003,6 +3004,22 @@ static int __cpuinit rcu_cpu_notify(struct 
> > notifier_block *self,
> >     return NOTIFY_OK;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int rcu_pm_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
> > +                    unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
> > +{
> > +   switch (action) {
> > +   case PM_HIBERNATION_PREPARE:
> > +           rcu_expedited = 1;
> > +           break;
> > +   case PM_POST_RESTORE:
> > +           rcu_expedited = 0;
> > +           break;
> > +   default:
> > +           break;
> > +   }
> > +   return NOTIFY_OK;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Spawn the kthread that handles this RCU flavor's grace periods.
> >   */
> > @@ -3243,6 +3260,7 @@ void __init rcu_init(void)
> >      * or the scheduler are operational.
> >      */
> >     cpu_notifier(rcu_cpu_notify, 0);
> > +   pm_notifier(rcu_pm_notify, 0);
> >     for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> >             rcu_cpu_notify(NULL, CPU_UP_PREPARE, (void *)(long)cpu);
> >  }
> 
> 
> Thanks!  This patch did not make any difference for me by itself, for
> pretty obvious reasons (I didn't time restore from hibernate - only from
> suspend). But it pointed me in the right direction.  Applying the
> attached patch on top of that one fixed the problem.
> 
> Note that I'm also changing the restore from hibernate hook. According
> to Documentation/power/notifiers.txt :
> 
>  PM_POST_RESTORE         An error occurred during restore from hibernation.
>                          Device drivers' restore callbacks have been executed
>                          and tasks have been thawed.
> 
> 
> I believe Borislav must have meant 
> 
>  PM_POST_HIBERNATION     The system memory state has been restored from a
>                          hibernation image or an error occurred during
>                          hibernation.  Device drivers' restore callbacks have
>                          been executed and tasks have been thawed.
> 
> in the above patch?
> 
> Please include some combination of these patches in your upcoming v3.10
> fixes.  Thanks.

I have queued the following patch, thank you, Bjørn!

                                                        Thanx, Paul

> Bjørn
> 

> >From cf169d21274911fea4b6a89a0a2c7b370d9de441 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: =?UTF-8?q?Bj=C3=B8rn=20Mork?= <[email protected]>
> Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 17:51:10 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] rcu: Really switch to expedited grace periods for suspend
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> 
> commit 587ff2cf ("rcu: Expedite grace periods during suspend/resume")
> enabled expedited grace periods for hibernation, but not for suspend.
> The same issue applies to both cases, so apply the same logic.
> 
> Restoring on post hibernation and post suspend, but not on post
> restore, which only applies to the restore error case.
> 
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Bjørn Mork <[email protected]>
> ---
>  kernel/rcutree.c |    4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
> index 6934238..2dcbf84 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> @@ -3103,9 +3103,11 @@ static int rcu_pm_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
>  {
>       switch (action) {
>       case PM_HIBERNATION_PREPARE:
> +     case PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE:
>               rcu_expedited = 1;
>               break;
> -     case PM_POST_RESTORE:
> +     case PM_POST_HIBERNATION:
> +     case PM_POST_SUSPEND:
>               rcu_expedited = 0;
>               break;
>       default:
> -- 
> 1.7.10.4
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to