Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for mxs as well.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mxs.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mxs.c b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mxs.c
index 5b62b64..66fe810 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mxs.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mxs.c
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
 #include <linux/err.h>
 #include <linux/gpio.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
 #include <linux/irqchip/mxs.h>
 #include <linux/micrel_phy.h>
 #include <linux/of_address.h>
@@ -435,7 +434,6 @@ static const char *mxs_dt_compat[] __initdata = {
 
 DT_MACHINE_START(MXS, "Freescale MXS (Device Tree)")
        .map_io         = debug_ll_io_init,
-       .init_irq       = irqchip_init,
        .handle_irq     = icoll_handle_irq,
        .init_time      = mxs_timer_init,
        .init_machine   = mxs_machine_init,
-- 
1.8.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to