On Tue 14 May 2013 11:10:33 PM CST, Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Liu Jiang <liu...@gmail.com> wrote:On 05/14/2013 04:26 PM, Gu Zheng wrote: I suggest to use pci_release_dev() instead because it also needs to release OF related resources. I will update it in next version.diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c index bc075a3..2ac6338 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c @@ -1281,7 +1281,7 @@ static struct pci_dev *pci_scan_device(struct pci_bus *bus pci_set_of_node(dev); if (pci_setup_device(dev)) { - kfree(dev); + pci_release_dev(&dev->dev); return NULL;no, should move pci_set_of_node calling into pci_setup_device. Yinghai
I'm not sure whether we should call pci_set_of_node() for SR-IOV devices too,
any suggestions here? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
