We can now drop the msg_lock and msg_lock_check functions along
with a bogus comment introduced previously in semctl_down.

Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bu...@hp.com>
---
 ipc/msg.c | 25 -------------------------
 ipc/sem.c |  1 -
 2 files changed, 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ipc/msg.c b/ipc/msg.c
index 1654be4..3b7b4b5 100644
--- a/ipc/msg.c
+++ b/ipc/msg.c
@@ -141,31 +141,6 @@ void __init msg_init(void)
                                IPC_MSG_IDS, sysvipc_msg_proc_show);
 }
 
-/*
- * msg_lock_(check_) routines are called in the paths where the rw_mutex
- * is not held.
- */
-static inline struct msg_queue *msg_lock(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int id)
-{
-       struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp = ipc_lock(&msg_ids(ns), id);
-
-       if (IS_ERR(ipcp))
-               return (struct msg_queue *)ipcp;
-
-       return container_of(ipcp, struct msg_queue, q_perm);
-}
-
-static inline struct msg_queue *msg_lock_check(struct ipc_namespace *ns,
-                                               int id)
-{
-       struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp = ipc_lock_check(&msg_ids(ns), id);
-
-       if (IS_ERR(ipcp))
-               return (struct msg_queue *)ipcp;
-
-       return container_of(ipcp, struct msg_queue, q_perm);
-}
-
 static inline struct msg_queue *msq_obtain_object(struct ipc_namespace *ns, 
int id)
 {
        struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp = ipc_obtain_object(&msg_ids(ns), id);
diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c
index f7d99f9..8223f17 100644
--- a/ipc/sem.c
+++ b/ipc/sem.c
@@ -1281,7 +1281,6 @@ static int semctl_down(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int 
semid,
                                      &semid64.sem_perm, 0);
        if (IS_ERR(ipcp)) {
                err = PTR_ERR(ipcp);
-               /* the ipc lock is not held upon failure */
                goto out_unlock1;
        }
 
-- 
1.7.11.7

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to