Hi, Jeff!
> Basically the PCI core should implement what PM is necessary, because
> eventually struct pci_driver will become a more generic struct driver.
I just wanted to make sure that you don't expect any problems if we go
this way.
> Why does maestro.c not use my suggestion? Because it doesn't use struct
> pci_driver.
I see. It's not a pure PCI driver. I wonder what happens if some other
driver becomes "impure" e.g. by adding PCMCIA support.
> Why does trident.c not use my suggestion? Only because noone has
> written and tested the patch for it yet :) It uses struct pci_driver
> and should be updated to use ::suspend/resume.
First part (writing the patch) is done:
http://www.red-bean.com/~proski/linux/trident_pm.diff
I only know that it compiles. I have no hardware I can test it on. Please
don't apply until tested!
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
