On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 01:34 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>
> 
> Now that the memory offlining should be taken care of by the
> companion device offlining code in acpi_scan_hot_remove(), the
> ACPI memory hotplug driver doesn't need to offline it in
> acpi_memory_remove_memory() any more.  Consequently, it doesn't
> need to call remove_memory() any more, which means that that
> funtion may be dropped entirely, because acpi_memory_remove_memory()
> is the only user of it.

The off-lining part of remove_memory() can be removed, but not the
hot-delete part.  Please see my comments below.

> Make the changes described above to get rid of the dead code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c |   15 ------
>  include/linux/memory_hotplug.h |    1 
>  mm/memory_hotplug.c            |  102 
> -----------------------------------------
>  3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 116 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
> @@ -271,31 +271,20 @@ static int acpi_memory_enable_device(str
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int acpi_memory_remove_memory(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device)
> +static void acpi_memory_remove_memory(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device)
>  {
>       acpi_handle handle = mem_device->device->handle;
> -     int result = 0, nid;
>       struct acpi_memory_info *info, *n;
>  
> -     nid = acpi_get_node(handle);
> -
>       list_for_each_entry_safe(info, n, &mem_device->res_list, list) {
>               if (!info->enabled)
>                       continue;
>  
> -             if (nid < 0)
> -                     nid = memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(info->start_addr);
> -
> +             /* All of the memory blocks are offline at this point. */
>               acpi_unbind_memory_blocks(info, handle);
> -             result = remove_memory(nid, info->start_addr, info->length);

We still need to call remove_memory().

> -             if (result)
> -                     return result;
> -
>               list_del(&info->list);
>               kfree(info);
>       }
> -
> -     return result;
>  }
>  
>  static void acpi_memory_device_free(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device)
> Index: linux-pm/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
> +++ linux-pm/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
> @@ -252,7 +252,6 @@ extern int add_memory(int nid, u64 start
>  extern int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size);
>  extern int offline_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages);
>  extern bool is_memblock_offlined(struct memory_block *mem);
> -extern int remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size);
>  extern int sparse_add_one_section(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn,
>                                                               int nr_pages);
>  extern void sparse_remove_one_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section 
> *ms);
> Index: linux-pm/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ linux-pm/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -1670,41 +1670,6 @@ int walk_memory_range(unsigned long star
>  }

 :

> -
> -int __ref remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
> -{
> -     unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn;
> -     int ret = 0;
> -     int retry = 1;
> -
> -     start_pfn = PFN_DOWN(start);
> -     end_pfn = PFN_UP(start + size - 1);
> -
> -     /*
> -      * When CONFIG_MEMCG is on, one memory block may be used by other
> -      * blocks to store page cgroup when onlining pages. But we don't know
> -      * in what order pages are onlined. So we iterate twice to offline
> -      * memory:
> -      * 1st iterate: offline every non primary memory block.
> -      * 2nd iterate: offline primary (i.e. first added) memory block.
> -      */
> -repeat:
> -     walk_memory_range(start_pfn, end_pfn, &ret,
> -                       offline_memory_block_cb);
> -     if (ret) {
> -             if (!retry)
> -                     return ret;
> -
> -             retry = 0;
> -             ret = 0;
> -             goto repeat;
> -     }

The above procedure can be removed as it is for off-lining.

> -     lock_memory_hotplug();
> -
> -     /*
> -      * we have offlined all memory blocks like this:
> -      *   1. lock memory hotplug
> -      *   2. offline a memory block
> -      *   3. unlock memory hotplug
> -      *
> -      * repeat step1-3 to offline the memory block. All memory blocks
> -      * must be offlined before removing memory. But we don't hold the
> -      * lock in the whole operation. So we should check whether all
> -      * memory blocks are offlined.
> -      */
> -
> -     ret = walk_memory_range(start_pfn, end_pfn, NULL,
> -                             is_memblock_offlined_cb);
> -     if (ret) {
> -             unlock_memory_hotplug();
> -             return ret;
> -     }
> -

I think the above procedure is still useful for safe guard.

> -     /* remove memmap entry */
> -     firmware_map_remove(start, start + size, "System RAM");
> -
> -     arch_remove_memory(start, size);
> -
> -     try_offline_node(nid);

The above procedure performs memory hot-delete specific operations and
is necessary.

Thanks,
-Toshi

> -     unlock_memory_hotplug();
> -
> -     return 0;
> -}


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to