On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:14 AM, David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> wrote: > From: "Eilon Greenstein" <eil...@broadcom.com> > Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 10:06:43 +0300 > >> Hopefully this series will be accepted so we can send follow up support >> for the bnx2x as well. > > I think in two or three more iterations it will be merged. > > There are no objections on the fundamentals, it's just implementation > details and coding style at this point.
Dave, sorry, I might be a bit behind the rest of the reviewers, but I just fail to understand nor find any reference that explains the module param of ixgbe nor it makes sense to me to merge that piece of the code upstream (its not for staging, correct?), as I wrote here http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=136908123432072&w=2 basically, I know you're not a great fun of module params (to say the least) and surely not something named "allow_unsafe_removal", thoughts? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/