On Fri, 3 May 2013 17:35:44 -0500 Russ Anderson <[email protected]> wrote:

> The routine disable_nonboot_cpus() shuts down cpus sequentially
> using for_each_online_cpu(cpu) to call cpu_down() one cpu at
> a time.  cpu_down() calls __stop_machine() which stops all
> the cpus while it disables one.  Then it re-enables the remaining
> cpus, only to do it all over again for the next cpu.  The 
> result is that it takes 16 minutes on a 1024 cpu system to 
> disable 1023 cpus.
> 
> This patch changes disable_nonboot_cpus() to pass a bitmask
> of cpus to cpu_down() and modifies cpu_down() to only call
> __stop_machine() once.
> 
> On a 1024 cpu system this reduces the time it takes to disable
> all but one cpu from 16 minutes down to 4 minutes.

That's still a helluva long time.  What's the kernel *doing* for
all that time?

> --- linux.orig/kernel/cpu.c   2013-05-03 09:56:31.145508321 -0500
> +++ linux/kernel/cpu.c        2013-05-03 17:01:20.652959400 -0500
>
> ...
>
> @@ -255,21 +255,21 @@ static int __ref take_cpu_down(void *_pa
>       if (err < 0)
>               return err;
>  
> -     cpu_notify(CPU_DYING | param->mod, param->hcpu);
> +     cpu_notify(CPU_DYING | param->mod, hcpu);
>       /* Park the stopper thread */
>       kthread_park(current);
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
>  /* Requires cpu_add_remove_lock to be held */
> -static int __ref _cpu_down(unsigned int cpu, int tasks_frozen)
> +static int __ref _cpu_down(const cpumask_t *cpus_to_offline, int 
> tasks_frozen)

_cpu_down() is now misnamed - it downs multiple CPUs.

>  {
> -     int err, nr_calls = 0;
> +     int err = 0, cpu = 0, nr_calls = 0;
>       void *hcpu = (void *)(long)cpu;
> +     cpumask_var_t cpus_offlined;
>       unsigned long mod = tasks_frozen ? CPU_TASKS_FROZEN : 0;
>       struct take_cpu_down_param tcd_param = {
>               .mod = mod,
> -             .hcpu = hcpu,
>       };
>  
>       if (num_online_cpus() == 1)
> @@ -278,46 +278,67 @@ static int __ref _cpu_down(unsigned int
>       if (!cpu_online(cpu))
>               return -EINVAL;
>  
> +     if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&cpus_offlined, GFP_KERNEL))
> +             return -ENOMEM;
> +
>       cpu_hotplug_begin();
> +     cpumask_copy(cpus_offlined, cpus_to_offline);
>  
> -     err = __cpu_notify(CPU_DOWN_PREPARE | mod, hcpu, -1, &nr_calls);
> -     if (err) {
> -             nr_calls--;
> -             __cpu_notify(CPU_DOWN_FAILED | mod, hcpu, nr_calls, NULL);
> -             printk("%s: attempt to take down CPU %u failed\n",
> +     for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, *cpus_to_offline) {
> +             if (!cpu_online(cpu))
> +                     continue;
> +             hcpu = (void *)(long)cpu;
> +             err = __cpu_notify(CPU_DOWN_PREPARE | mod, hcpu, -1, &nr_calls);
> +             if (err) {
> +                     nr_calls--;
> +                     __cpu_notify(CPU_DOWN_FAILED | mod, hcpu, nr_calls, 
> NULL);
> +                     pr_err("%s: attempt to take down CPU %u failed\n",
>                               __func__, cpu);
> -             goto out_release;
> +                     goto out_release;
> +             }
> +             smpboot_park_threads(cpu);
>       }
> -     smpboot_park_threads(cpu);
>  
> -     err = __stop_machine(take_cpu_down, &tcd_param, cpumask_of(cpu));
> +     err = __stop_machine(take_cpu_down, &tcd_param, cpus_to_offline);
>       if (err) {
>               /* CPU didn't die: tell everyone.  Can't complain. */

This comment is now inaccurate.  "One or more of the CPUs didn't die"?.

I'm not sure what "Can't complain" means.  Perhaps expand on this while
you're there?

> -             smpboot_unpark_threads(cpu);
> -             cpu_notify_nofail(CPU_DOWN_FAILED | mod, hcpu);
> +             for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, *cpus_to_offline) {
> +                     hcpu = (void *)(long)cpu;
> +                     smpboot_unpark_threads(cpu);
> +                     cpu_notify_nofail(CPU_DOWN_FAILED | mod, hcpu);

Is this accurate?  What happens if we asked stop_machine() to down 100
CPUs but it failed at CPU #50?  We now tell listeners that we failed to
down all 100 CPUs?  That's not true.

> +             }
>               goto out_release;
>       }
> -     BUG_ON(cpu_online(cpu));
>  
>       /*
>        * The migration_call() CPU_DYING callback will have removed all
>        * runnable tasks from the cpu, there's only the idle task left now
>        * that the migration thread is done doing the stop_machine thing.
> -      *
> -      * Wait for the stop thread to go away.
>        */
> -     while (!idle_cpu(cpu))
> -             cpu_relax();
> -
> -     /* This actually kills the CPU. */
> -     __cpu_die(cpu);
> +     for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, *cpus_offlined) {
> +             BUG_ON(cpu_online(cpu));
>  
> -     /* CPU is completely dead: tell everyone.  Too late to complain. */
> -     cpu_notify_nofail(CPU_DEAD | mod, hcpu);
> -
> -     check_for_tasks(cpu);
> +             /*
> +              * Wait for the stop thread to go away.
> +              */
> +             while (!idle_cpu(cpu))
> +                     cpu_relax();
> +
> +             /*
> +              * This actually kills the CPU.
> +              */
> +             __cpu_die(cpu);
> +
> +             /*
> +              * CPU is completely dead: tell everyone.  Too late to complain.
> +              */
> +             hcpu = (void *)(long)cpu;
> +             cpu_notify_nofail(CPU_DEAD | mod, hcpu);
> +             check_for_tasks(cpu);
> +     }
>  
>  out_release:
> +     free_cpumask_var(cpus_offlined);
>       cpu_hotplug_done();

Swap the above two lines and we reduced the locked region by an
unmeasurable amount!

>       if (!err)
>               cpu_notify_nofail(CPU_POST_DEAD | mod, hcpu);
>
> ...
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to