On Wed, 22 May 2013 15:51:09 -0400 J__rn Engel <jo...@logfs.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 22 May 2013 13:48:37 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Thu, 9 May 2013 16:43:07 -0400 Joern Engel <jo...@logfs.org> wrote: > > > > > Very few machines ever ran with 1.0 format and by now I doubt whether a > > > single one still does. No need to carry that code along. > > > > aw geeze. Can we please clean up the patch series? > > People started using my git tree, so I decided to keep it stable and > not fold fixes into the main patch. That admittedly sucks for review. > > Would you like me to create a single patch for review? And after > that, do you want to carry a single patch in your series or should I > keep my tree and try to get that merged? Either way works for me. > Well I do think a significant amount of change is needed, in particular some more use of the /* operator. Can you set up a new tree for that and for linux-next and leave the existing one in place? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
