From: Namjae Jeon <[email protected]>

There is no need to initialize few pointers in f2fs_parent_dir
as the values are not checked and instead directly initialized
values are used.

Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Amit Sahrawat <[email protected]>
---
 fs/f2fs/dir.c |    6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/dir.c b/fs/f2fs/dir.c
index fc1dacf..b278bfb 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/dir.c
@@ -215,9 +215,9 @@ struct f2fs_dir_entry *f2fs_find_entry(struct inode *dir,
 
 struct f2fs_dir_entry *f2fs_parent_dir(struct inode *dir, struct page **p)
 {
-       struct page *page = NULL;
-       struct f2fs_dir_entry *de = NULL;
-       struct f2fs_dentry_block *dentry_blk = NULL;
+       struct page *page;
+       struct f2fs_dir_entry *de;
+       struct f2fs_dentry_block *dentry_blk;
 
        page = get_lock_data_page(dir, 0);
        if (IS_ERR(page))
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to