On Tue 28-05-13 10:23:25, Li Wang wrote:
> For hole punching, currently ext4 will synchronously write back the
> dirty pages fit into the hole, since the data on the disk responding
> to those pages are to be deleted, it is benefical to directly release
> those pages, no matter they are dirty or not, except the ordered case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Li Wang <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Yunchuan Wen <[email protected]>
> Cc: Dmitry Monakhov <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Zheng Liu <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
> ---
> Hi Jan,
>   Did you mean this?
>   It seems you donot like the jbd2_journal_begin_ordered_discard:),
> However, what do you think of calling jbd2_journal_begin_ordered_punch_hole()
> from jbd2_journal_begin_ordered_truncate()? In my option, 
> the two guys stand at the same level. Nevertheless, 
> it is up to your choice.
  Well, punch hole is a more generic version of truncate so it seems
perfectly fine for me to implement truncate using punch hole. Thanks for
updating the patch!

                                                                Honza


> ---
>  fs/ext4/inode.c       |   27 ++++++++++++++++-----------
>  fs/jbd2/journal.c     |    2 +-
>  fs/jbd2/transaction.c |   29 ++++++-----------------------
>  include/linux/jbd2.h  |   33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  4 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index d6382b8..844d1b8 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -3569,6 +3569,16 @@ int ext4_can_truncate(struct inode *inode)
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static inline int ext4_begin_ordered_punch_hole(struct inode *inode,
> +                                            loff_t start, loff_t length)
> +{
> +     if (!EXT4_I(inode)->jinode)
> +             return 0;
> +     return jbd2_journal_begin_ordered_punch_hole(EXT4_JOURNAL(inode),
> +                                                 EXT4_I(inode)->jinode,
> +                                                 start, start+length-1);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * ext4_punch_hole: punches a hole in a file by releaseing the blocks
>   * associated with the given offset and length
> @@ -3602,17 +3612,6 @@ int ext4_punch_hole(struct file *file, loff_t offset, 
> loff_t length)
>  
>       trace_ext4_punch_hole(inode, offset, length);
>  
> -     /*
> -      * Write out all dirty pages to avoid race conditions
> -      * Then release them.
> -      */
> -     if (mapping->nrpages && mapping_tagged(mapping, PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY)) {
> -             ret = filemap_write_and_wait_range(mapping, offset,
> -                                                offset + length - 1);
> -             if (ret)
> -                     return ret;
> -     }
> -
>       mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
>       /* It's not possible punch hole on append only file */
>       if (IS_APPEND(inode) || IS_IMMUTABLE(inode)) {
> @@ -3644,6 +3643,12 @@ int ext4_punch_hole(struct file *file, loff_t offset, 
> loff_t length)
>       first_page_offset = first_page << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
>       last_page_offset = last_page << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
>  
> +     if (ext4_should_order_data(inode)) {
> +             ret = ext4_begin_ordered_punch_hole(inode, offset, length);
> +             if (ret)
> +                     return ret;
> +     }
> +
>       /* Now release the pages */
>       if (last_page_offset > first_page_offset) {
>               truncate_pagecache_range(inode, first_page_offset,
> diff --git a/fs/jbd2/journal.c b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
> index 9545757..7af4e4f 100644
> --- a/fs/jbd2/journal.c
> +++ b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(jbd2_journal_force_commit);
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(jbd2_journal_file_inode);
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(jbd2_journal_init_jbd_inode);
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(jbd2_journal_release_jbd_inode);
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(jbd2_journal_begin_ordered_truncate);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(jbd2_journal_begin_ordered_punch_hole);
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(jbd2_inode_cache);
>  
>  static void __journal_abort_soft (journal_t *journal, int errno);
> diff --git a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
> index 10f524c..262b1c3 100644
> --- a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
> +++ b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
> @@ -2305,29 +2305,10 @@ done:
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> -/*
> - * File truncate and transaction commit interact with each other in a
> - * non-trivial way.  If a transaction writing data block A is
> - * committing, we cannot discard the data by truncate until we have
> - * written them.  Otherwise if we crashed after the transaction with
> - * write has committed but before the transaction with truncate has
> - * committed, we could see stale data in block A.  This function is a
> - * helper to solve this problem.  It starts writeout of the truncated
> - * part in case it is in the committing transaction.
> - *
> - * Filesystem code must call this function when inode is journaled in
> - * ordered mode before truncation happens and after the inode has been
> - * placed on orphan list with the new inode size. The second condition
> - * avoids the race that someone writes new data and we start
> - * committing the transaction after this function has been called but
> - * before a transaction for truncate is started (and furthermore it
> - * allows us to optimize the case where the addition to orphan list
> - * happens in the same transaction as write --- we don't have to write
> - * any data in such case).
> - */
> -int jbd2_journal_begin_ordered_truncate(journal_t *journal,
> +
> +int jbd2_journal_begin_ordered_punch_hole(journal_t *journal,
>                                       struct jbd2_inode *jinode,
> -                                     loff_t new_size)
> +                                     loff_t start, loff_t end)
>  {
>       transaction_t *inode_trans, *commit_trans;
>       int ret = 0;
> @@ -2346,10 +2327,12 @@ int jbd2_journal_begin_ordered_truncate(journal_t 
> *journal,
>       spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
>       if (inode_trans == commit_trans) {
>               ret = filemap_fdatawrite_range(jinode->i_vfs_inode->i_mapping,
> -                     new_size, LLONG_MAX);
> +                     start, end);
>               if (ret)
>                       jbd2_journal_abort(journal, ret);
>       }
>  out:
>       return ret;
>  }
> +
> +
> diff --git a/include/linux/jbd2.h b/include/linux/jbd2.h
> index 6e051f4..8eb7865 100644
> --- a/include/linux/jbd2.h
> +++ b/include/linux/jbd2.h
> @@ -1126,12 +1126,41 @@ extern int       jbd2_journal_clear_err  (journal_t 
> *);
>  extern int      jbd2_journal_bmap(journal_t *, unsigned long, unsigned long 
> long *);
>  extern int      jbd2_journal_force_commit(journal_t *);
>  extern int      jbd2_journal_file_inode(handle_t *handle, struct jbd2_inode 
> *inode);
> -extern int      jbd2_journal_begin_ordered_truncate(journal_t *journal,
> -                             struct jbd2_inode *inode, loff_t new_size);
> +extern int      jbd2_journal_begin_ordered_punch_hole(journal_t *,
> +                                     struct jbd2_inode *,
> +                                     loff_t, loff_t);
>  extern void     jbd2_journal_init_jbd_inode(struct jbd2_inode *jinode, 
> struct inode *inode);
>  extern void     jbd2_journal_release_jbd_inode(journal_t *journal, struct 
> jbd2_inode *jinode);
>  
>  /*
> + * File truncate and transaction commit interact with each other in a
> + * non-trivial way.  If a transaction writing data block A is
> + * committing, we cannot discard the data by truncate until we have
> + * written them.  Otherwise if we crashed after the transaction with
> + * write has committed but before the transaction with truncate has
> + * committed, we could see stale data in block A.  This function is a
> + * helper to solve this problem.  It starts writeout of the truncated
> + * part in case it is in the committing transaction.
> + *
> + * Filesystem code must call this function when inode is journaled in
> + * ordered mode before truncation happens and after the inode has been
> + * placed on orphan list with the new inode size. The second condition
> + * avoids the race that someone writes new data and we start
> + * committing the transaction after this function has been called but
> + * before a transaction for truncate is started (and furthermore it
> + * allows us to optimize the case where the addition to orphan list
> + * happens in the same transaction as write --- we don't have to write
> + * any data in such case).
> + */
> +static inline int jbd2_journal_begin_ordered_truncate(journal_t *journal,
> +                                     struct jbd2_inode *jinode,
> +                                     loff_t new_size)
> +{
> +     return jbd2_journal_begin_ordered_punch_hole(journal, jinode,
> +                                               new_size, LLONG_MAX);
> +}
> +
> +/*
>   * journal_head management
>   */
>  struct journal_head *jbd2_journal_add_journal_head(struct buffer_head *bh);
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to